"INFAMOUS CONVICTS THAT BECOME PARENTS"

Judith Yates (Criminologist) attempts to explain, why women marry and have children with infamous criminals. Published on examiner.com, her article includes Charles "Tex" Watson.

"The latest in the Joran van der Sloot media express: he has announced he is going to father a child. Evidently the convicted murderer of Stephany Flores in Peru, and the suspect in Natalee Holloway’s disappearance in Aruba, was permitted conjugal visits. Another inmate, listed as his wife, was allowed to visit".  How does this happen?

Joran van der Sloot, a media junkie, is serving 28 years in a Peruvian prison, but conjugal visits are not a thing of other countries.  Charles ‘Tex’ Watson, Charles Manson’s right hand man, married in 1979 while serving life in a California prison; Watson has fathered several children during conjugal visits.  Ted Bundy, the convicted serial killer, fathered a child during visitation with Carole Boone; he was on Florida’s death row where conjugal visits were not allowed (An officer, who was employed on the row supervising Bundy, explained to this writer: Bundy secretly ejaculated into a balloon, passed it in a kiss to Boone, who held it between her breasts as she rushed to a fertility doctor. There was no staff bribe, as long suspected). Serial killer Jeff Dahmer received thousands of marriage proposals in the mail, once he was locked away. No matter how or who, the question is: why father a child with an infamous convicted criminal?

It is possible these women want to become “famous” in their own way, have light shed on them, get their minutes of fame. With fame comes fortune, and a lot of attention. During Bundy’s trial media attention was heavily directed on Carole Boone. In the future we will see some publication attempting to get the “exclusive” on van der Sloot’s child and the mother. “Exclusive” in journalism usually rhymes with “money.” Someone who was a nobody (an inmate in a prison) is now a someone (van der Sloot’s girl).

There is also the natural lure of curiosity and thrill. These bad people are safely locked away so they can’t “get you.” They have a notoriety of their own, enhanced by the press and the curiosity seekers. People see a thrill in corresponding with murderers, rapists, and various thugs for two reasons: trying to understand the person and the thrill of communication with someone so heinous. True Crime is a popular genre and the majority of readers are female. Sharlene Martin, of Martin Literary Agency, explains, “Everyone wants to understand why unusual things occur…true crime readers …are so disturbed by the evil among us that they gain relief from seeing it made understandable…”

What better way to try to understand evil? We all have a “thrill factor” in us that is heightened by certain things: skydiving, owning a ‘dangerous’ pet, or riding roller coasters. To the extreme are those with a high thrill factor; we call them ‘adrenaline junkies.’ True Crime readers could be considered on the low factor end: ‘I want to find out from the safety of my reading chair.’ They take the step up to contacting the criminal, and then a possible visit because these criminals are master manipulators. And think of the reactions when you admit, “I’m Charles Manson’s pen pal” or even better, “I’m going to visit Charles Manson in prison.”

Then there are always those who believe the inmate is either rehabilitated or innocent. Perhaps the nurturing instinct has kicked in and the desire to take care of these inmates overshadows common sense. They believe the excuses of bad childhood, rotten legal assistance, or because the inmate is good-looking, the inmate needs them. Marrying an inmate is the ultimate power: they ask me for money, for attention, they are contained so they cannot run off, beat me, cheat, etc. Marrying an infamous inmate one-ups the power ante.

So woman killer Joran van der Sloot joins the ranks of Charles Watson, Ted Bundy, and hundreds of other infamous convicts who have fathered a child with a woman who either craves attention, is seeking a thrill or trying to understand, or is simply hoodwinked. She will claim she loves him. Mostly, she will say she sees a side to him no one knows - just as the other victims discovered." 

October 8, 2012 by Judith Yates

Judith Yates, Nashville True Crime Examiner
J.A. Yates is currently completing her Ph.D. in criminal justice. A criminologist who has lectured, written, studied, and taught about crime and crime prevention for more than 10 years, she has been employed in a myriad of law enforcement jobs.